Bug#736150: transition: libexosip2
On 05/06/14 20:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -confirmed
>
> On 27/05/14 17:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 20/04/14 08:46, Mark Purcell wrote:
>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:37:52 Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> Are there any API changes? Have the reverse deps been build tested?
>>>
>>> Julien,
>>>
>>> No API changes apparent.
>>>
>>> sipwitch binNMU OK
>>> linphone binNMU OK
>>>
>>> Updated Ben file:
>>>
>>> title = "libexosip2";
>>> is_affected = .depends ~ "libosip2-10|libexosip2-10" | .depends ~
>>> "libosip2-11|libexosip2-11";
>>> is_good = .depends ~ "libosip2-11|libexosip2-11";
>>> is_bad = .depends ~ "libosip2-10|libexosip2-10";
>>
>> I have updated the tracker (fixing "libfoo|libbar" to /libfoo|libbar/). libosip
>> brings another rdep, siproxd. Can that one be handled with a binnmu? If so,
>> please go ahead and upload libexosip and libosip to unstable.
>
> Please hold this until after the libgnutls-deb0-28 transition, as they clash and
> that one is ongoing now.
That's done. You can proceed with this now.
Regards,
Emilio
Reply to: