[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#747250: marked as done (nmu: ppl_1:1.1-2)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:54:25 +0200
with message-id <539ABC41.7030702@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#747250: nmu: ppl_1:1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #747250,
regarding nmu: ppl_1:1.1-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
747250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Please rebuild ppl against new swi-prolog, it's needed beacuse of
library soname change.

nmu ppl_1:1.1-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against swi-prolog 6.6.5"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 12/06/14 23:29, Євгеній Мещеряков wrote:
> 12 червня 2014 о 18:14 +0200 Julien Cristau написав(-ла):
>>> What library changed its SONAME?
>>>
>> I suspect the issue is:
> That's right.
> 
>>
>>     libppl-swi/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/armel unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.4.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~)
>>     libppl-swi/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox (<< 6.6.3.0~)
>>
>> And:
>>     Files in second .deb but not in first
>>     -------------------------------------
>>     -rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/lib/libswipl.so.6.6.6
>>     lrwxrwxrwx  root/root   /usr/lib/libswipl.so -> libswipl.so.6.6.6
>>
>>     Files in first .deb but not in second
>>     -------------------------------------
>>     -rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/lib/libswipl.so.6.6.5
>>     lrwxrwxrwx  root/root   /usr/lib/libswipl.so -> libswipl.so.6.6.5
>>
>> Євгеній, libswipl should really be its own split out binary package.
>> And change package names when its SONAME changes.
> I was thinking about it but, that library changes soname with every new
> upstream release. Additionaly I'll have to make the library package to
> depend on exact version of swi-prolog-nox package, because the library
> uses prolog parts. This will mean that different library packages will
> not be coinstallable.
> 
> So I don't see that there will be any advantages from changing the
> package name for swi-prolog, unlike for normal libraries. The only
> difference is requiring new processing for every upstream release.
> And still asking for bin-NMUs after that.

Alright, scheduled.

Regards,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: