[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#750020: marked as done (transition: eglibc)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:25:28 +0200
with message-id <539769B8.8090808@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#750020: transition: eglibc
has caused the Debian Bug report #750020,
regarding transition: eglibc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
750020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
uploaded in experimental and has been built successfully on all
architectures except armel and armhf. We have done manual builds on
these architectures and they have been successful.

As the libc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
rebuilt for this transition:

- dante
- libnih
- libnss-db
- unscd

In addition it should be noted that a few new symbols have been added
that might prevent a few other packages to transition to testing if they
pick up the new symbols. This time the amount of new symbols is quite
limited, so it should not concern a lot of packages:

- getrlimit64 and setrlimit64 on mips and mipsel
- longjmp, __longjmp_chk, siglongjmp, sigsetjmp, setjmp and getcontext
  on s390x

Thanks,
Aurelien



Ben file:

title = "eglibc";
is_affected = .depends ~ "/libc[0-9.]* \(<</";
is_good = .depends ~ "/libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.20\)/";
is_bad = .depends ~ "/libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.19\)/";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 04/06/14 22:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:17:06PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 31/05/14 21:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
>>> uploaded in experimental and has been built successfully on all
>>> architectures except armel and armhf. We have done manual builds on
>>> these architectures and they have been successful.
>>
>> Please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks, I have just uploaded it.

And it's in! Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: