Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc
Hi,
On 09/06/14 15:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
>>
>> That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that migrates.
>
> Yes, I uploaded a patched version (trivial because one line change). It
> has migrated already (and Stable isn't affected).
>
>> That would also let libenet and 0ad migrate.
>
> Both libnet and 0ad have also migrated to Testing. By the way, what's
> the relation between miniupnpc and libnet? I'm not sure I get it.
0ad depends on both libenet and miniupnpc, so if both transitions happened at
the same time, they would get entangled. That's why I wanted to wait until
libenet migrated, which as you say has happened already.
>> In the meantime, please upload to experimental so that it goes through NEW.
>
> This was done.
Good. I see there are build failures on kfreebsd.
> I also took time to review all reverse dependency rebuild. Here's the
> result, and it doesn't look good. :( The one who builds fine first:
>
> - bitcoin
> - sushi
> - transmission
>
> Though there's FTBFS issues seemingly related to the new version of
> miniupnpc with these:
>
> - 0ad: see [1] below
> - megaglest: see [2] below
> - warzone2100: see [3] below
Open bugs with severity important. Bonus points if you provide patches (that
will greatly help get this transition started (and finished)).
> And then these seem to have unrelated FTBFS in Sid:
>
> - eiskaltdcpp: FTBFS (in eiskaltdcpp-qt/src/ChatEdit.cpp which doesn't
> have UPNP stuff)
> - litecoin: FTBFS (but package not in Testing anyway)
Try to reproduce in a clean sid environment and report bugs with severity serious.
> What's the next step? Should I ask maintainers of 0ad, megaglest and
> warzone2100 to build and upload in experimental against the new version
> of miniupnpc first? Advices welcome!
Open those bugs and make them block this one. If you provide patches, at least
for the ones caused by miniupnpc, we could start the transition and then ask for
the patches to be applied, NMU-ing if that doesn't happen. Until we have
patches, we can't proceed as the transition would stall in unstable.
Uploads to experimental for the rdeps are fine, but not a necessity.
Regards,
Emilio
Reply to: