[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#731402: SpatiaLite transition



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 03/18/2014 06:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 00:56:48 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
> 
>> With osgEarth 2.4 and QGIS 2.2 added to the mix, the process
>> becomes:
>> 
>> 1) upload spatialite             4.1.1-6 to unstable 2) upload
>> librasterlite           1.1g-4 to unstable 3) binnmu mapnik
>> 2.2.0+ds1-6 in unstable
> 
> 1 and 2 happened, so I've done 3 (with a dep-wait on
> librasterlite2).
> 
>> 4) upload libgaiagraphics          0.5-2 to unstable 5) upload
>> spatialite-tools       4.1.1-3 to unstable 6) upload
>> spatialite-gui         1.7.1-3 to unstable 7) upload pyspatialite
>> 3.0.1-5 to unstable

4 to 7 also happened.

But only libgaiagraphics is currently built for all architectures, the
others still need to be built on hurd-i386, as does mapnik.

>> 8) binnmu gdal             1.10.1+dfsg-4 in unstable

With both spatialite and librasterlite built on all architectures,
it's time for GDAL:

nmu gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-4+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libspatialite5"

>> 9) binnmu merkaartor            0.18.1-3 in unstable

Can be scheduled now too, or maybe wait for GDAL first.

nmu merkaartor_0.18.1-3+b2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libspatialite5"

>> 10) upload osgearth          2.5.0+dfsg-1 to unstable 11) upload
>> qgis                   2.2.0-1 to unstable

Will happen after the GDAL rebuild.

> Cheers, Julien

Kind Regards,

Bas

- -- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=YvKN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: