[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#740090: transition: libiodbc2



On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:55:44 +0100, Maximiliano Curia wrote:

> ¡Hola Julien!
> 
> El 2014-03-17 a las 22:51 +0100, Julien Cristau escribió:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 17:34:17 +0100, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> 
> > > (please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ...
> > >  for more info see: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions)
> 
> > > Requestion a transition slot to upload libiodbc2 3.52.8 to unstable.
> > > The transition is needed as the new package moves the headers to
> > > /usr/include/iodbc hoping to gain coinstallability with unixodbc.
> 
> > > I've submited patches in the affected packages: #740060 #740067 #740074 #740082
> > > Packages that use iodbc-config to get the cflags are not affected (which is
> > > only soprano), also libopendbx is not directly affected as it optionaly
> > > build-depends on libiodbc2-dev (although it should probably remove the
> > > option).
> 
> > do you plan on NMUing with these patches?
> 
> Yes, as soon as iodbc 3.52.8 enters unstable, the affected packages will
> ftbfs so a delayed/5 nmu should be ok.
> 
If the patches are backwards compatible (ie work with the current
iodbc), I'd rather have them in sid *first*.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: