On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:04:17 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > The Ruby maintainers want to make sure ruby1.9.1 is not included in > Jessie. > > Different from the ruby1.8 transition, which was huge and is almost > done, work on this one is just starting though it tends to be a lot > smoother. > > We begin with ~140 packages in "bad" state, of which: > > - ~120 will be able to be fixed with binNMU's once ruby-defaults is > updated to not pull ruby1.9.1 anymore. > > - ~20 seem to be explicitly (build-) depending on ruby1.9.1. We will > investigate them individually, file bugs and when possible send > patches. I don't expect this to be too much trouble, since packages > that already work with ruby1.9.1 tend to not have problems with later > versions. > Hi Antonio, I've now set up a tracker, my understanding is you don't need anything else from us at least until ruby-defaults is switched. Yell if that's not accurate. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature