Bug#736219: transition: gloox
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 22:45:02 -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
>> transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
>> gloox, currently in NEW queue, results are as follows):
>>
>> licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
>> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
>> uwsgi (NOT in testing, removed due to removal of openjdk6 - #720571)
>> fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)
>>
> Feel free to upload to sid. Let us know when the package is built on
> all archs so binNMUs can be scheduled.
I've uploaded gloox to sid and can confirm that it's been successfully
built on all archs. Thanks!
Regards,
Vincent
Reply to: