Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check
On 12/03/2014 19:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> As I read/understand the above, you basically say (something along the
> lines of):
>
> """
> The Debian kFreeBSD porters will not support packages, where upstream
> have no (visible) interest/intention of being portable (beyond
> ${OS}-any) nor their reverse dependencies. Examples of these include
> (but are not limited to) systemd and GNOME (via GDM).
> """
>
> It is not that I want to change your wording or anything. I just wanted
> to make sure I had captured the important parts of it.
I don't think it's possible to put this in generic wording. There are specific
reasons why GNOME can't be considered a portable program. I think they're enough
well-known so that I shouldn't need to publicize them.
--
Robert Millan
Reply to: