On 09/03/14 17:09, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 at 21:33:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Yet another GNOME transition; this time it's cogl's turn. > > I assume this is the cogl 1.17/1.18 branch for GNOME 3.12, superseding my > earlier suggestion (#736920) of a cogl 1.16 transition (libcogl15, > corresponding to GNOME 3.10)? Indeed. Sorry, I forgot you had already opened a transition bug. Emilio