[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#739415: marked as done (transition: libraw)

Your message dated Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:51:54 +0100
with message-id <20140305065154.GR17725@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#739415: transition: libraw
has caused the Debian Bug report #739415,
regarding transition: libraw
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
739415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


I'd like to request a slot for taking care of the libraw transition.
I rebuilt all the reverse dependencies, and they all built correctly.

Reverse dependencies
================
* entangle
* evas-loaders
* freeimage
* luminance-hdr
* shotwell

Ben file:
title = "libraw";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libraw-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libraw10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libraw9";

Cheers,
Luca

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 13:54:39 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> 
> I'd like to request a slot for taking care of the libraw transition.
> I rebuilt all the reverse dependencies, and they all built correctly.
> 
All in testing now.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: