Control: severity 730833 important On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:19:29PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > On 18/02/2014 21:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > >> On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > If the best thing is to drop non-linux architectures, I'd be fine with that. > > I don't want to drop architectures from the packaging without asking porters > > first. > > I think if upstream doesn't consider it a bug to copy non-portable declarations from > Linux headers, it's probably reasonable to consider u-boot as Linux-specific software. > > Attempting to fight this kind of trend is tends to be very costly, but ultimately it's > your call as maintainer to decide whether it's worth it. Thanks for the comments. I'm thinking it's not worth the effort, and plan to mark it as linux only in the next upload, and lowering the severity on the bug now. live well, vagrant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature