Bug#734588: I: sdlgfx 2.0.25
- To: Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>
- Cc: 734588@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#734588: I: sdlgfx 2.0.25
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:33:27 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140218193326.GW17725@betterave.cristau.org>
- Reply-to: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, 734588@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1389088634.55207.YahooMailNeo@web171802.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
- References: <CAPQ4b8nmpEWwkBeWu1UEn6RrddPo69YmAnUpmSvVJf7-eZg_XQ@mail.gmail.com> <1387552425.71103.YahooMailNeo@web171804.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CAPQ4b8kRduHkFK5Bf=cUpK3+RgWmgPaq__Yfq-iTLCzdyR-irg@mail.gmail.com> <1387556516.26612.YahooMailNeo@web171806.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CAPQ4b8kc9a1iK-ZxHfB4hjHpC-pVOyoyuftmtUuAT=RV=MkhkA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQ4b8=F5uPUT0-00_iFQZRErF42b5gjNCuwHui5gmiSOE+XLA@mail.gmail.com> <1387700944.46006.YahooMailNeo@web171803.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CAPQ4b8kBO4DRXHLvGOeKOcrV-k7z5qDUD6DdpUrouGoiuT0oBw@mail.gmail.com> <1389088634.55207.YahooMailNeo@web171802.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 09:57:14 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi debian release Managers!
>
> Together with Manuel (the sdlgfx uploader, who reads in cc), we
> decided to ask for a transition
>
> the package can be found here [1] and brings a really similar API, but
> the packages that build-deps from it will likely need a binNMU to
> build against the new ABI/API.
>
>
> We are most sure that mostly of them (if not all of them) will just
> need a rebuild.
>
> Unfortunately the package will go through the new queue (we can avoid
> that, as explained below), because of the change from libsdl-gfx1.2-4
> to libsdl-gfx1.2-5.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sdlgfx.html
>
Hi,
why is the new version not in experimental? That would have taken care
of the NEW delay separately from the transition to sid/testing. Please
remove the moreinfo tag from this bug once you have a package in
experimental.
Cheers,
Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: