[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#737906: transition: eglibc



Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote:
Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable.
The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using
internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUable.

Assuming that all we're expecting to be involved is the binNMUs, please go ahead (i.e. there aren't a bunch of "FTBFS against eglibc 2.18" bugs hiding up your sleeve somewhere :-).

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: