[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Requesting permission to upload certificatepatrol 2.0.14-4+deb7u1 to s-p-u



Hello release team,

hereby I'm asking for permission to upload the testing/sid version
2.0.14-4 of src:certificatepatrol to stable-proprosed-updates as in
the attached debdiff.

Rationale:

Today's upgrade of iceweasel in wheezy through [DSA 2858-1] increased
the version number from 17 to 24, breaking the wheezy version 2.0.14-3
of xul-ext-certificatepatrol due to upper limit in the acceptable
firefox/iceweasel version number in that package, a limit originally
inherited from upstream. This was fixed in unstable (2.0.14-4) about a
year ago but is now also needed in wheezy.

Two more things:

* Not a bit was changed in the actual code of certificatepatrol. The
  delta is about the xul-internal dependencies, and a small upgrade in
  the build options.

* While testing, I could not reproduce #705569, will double-check that
  later in sid. In other words, the stable user should not see any
  difference after the upgrade.

Regards,

    Christoph
diff -u certificatepatrol-2.0.14/install.rdf certificatepatrol-2.0.14/install.rdf
--- certificatepatrol-2.0.14/install.rdf
+++ certificatepatrol-2.0.14/install.rdf
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
       <Description>
         <em:id>{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}</em:id> <!-- Firefox, Iceweasel, Flock -->
         <em:minVersion>3.5</em:minVersion>
-        <em:maxVersion>19.0</em:maxVersion>
+        <em:maxVersion>4687</em:maxVersion>
       </Description>
     </em:targetApplication>
 
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
       <Description>
 	<em:id>{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6}</em:id> <!-- Thunderbird -->
 	<em:minVersion>3.0</em:minVersion>
-	<em:maxVersion>19.0</em:maxVersion>
+	<em:maxVersion>4687</em:maxVersion>
       </Description>
     </em:targetApplication>
 
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
       <Description>
         <em:id>{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}</em:id> <!-- SeaMonkey -->
         <em:minVersion>2.0</em:minVersion>
-        <em:maxVersion>2.7a1</em:maxVersion>
+        <em:maxVersion>4687</em:maxVersion>
       </Description>
     </em:targetApplication>
 
diff -u certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/compat certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/compat
--- certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/compat
+++ certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
diff -u certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/rules certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/rules
--- certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/rules
+++ certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/rules
@@ -4 +4 @@
-	dh --with xul-ext --buildsystem=xul_ext $@
+	dh $@ --with xul-ext --buildsystem=xul_ext
diff -u certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/changelog certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/changelog
--- certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/changelog
+++ certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+certificatepatrol (2.0.14-4+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium
+
+  * Upload to proposed-stable-updates to make certificatepatrol
+    usable with iceweasel 24. Closes: #738560
+
+ -- Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>  Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:13:36 +0000
+
+certificatepatrol (2.0.14-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Raise upper version limit again, to a value so that we're
+    hopefully not bothered again this century. Closes: #702836
+
+ -- Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>  Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:31:24 +0100
+
 certificatepatrol (2.0.14-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Raise upper version limit for iceweasel and icedove to 19. This
diff -u certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/control certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/control
--- certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/control
+++ certificatepatrol-2.0.14/debian/control
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~),
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9~),
     mozilla-devscripts (>= 0.22~),
-Standards-Version: 3.9.2
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
 Homepage: http://patrol.psyced.org/
 
 Package: xul-ext-certificatepatrol

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: