Bug#737952: marked as done (nmu: gammaray_2.0.0-1)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:57:15 +0000
with message-id <1391871435.5649.27.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#737952: nmu: gammaray_1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #737952,
regarding nmu: gammaray_2.0.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
737952: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
gammaray was sitting in NEW for a while so on amd64 it's still
built against Qt 5.2 (depends on libqt5core5 and qtbase-abi-5-1-0).
Please schedule a binNMU for gammaray:
nmu gammaray_1.3.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against Qt 5.2."
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 09:02 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
> On 2014-02-07 08:28, Felix Geyer wrote:
> > Please schedule a binNMU for gammaray:
> >
> > nmu gammaray_1.3.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against Qt 5.2."
>
> Sorry, obviously 2.0.0-1 should be rebuilt, not 1.3.0-1:
>
> nmu gammaray_2.0.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against Qt 5.2."
And you meant "still built against Qt 5.1". :-)
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: