[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#774029: unblock: screen-message/0.23-1



Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Ok, I managed to upload it...

Am 27. Dezember 2014 18:32:22 MEZ, schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
>On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 18:28 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Am Samstag, den 27.12.2014, 17:21 +0000 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
>> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>> > 
>> > On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 18:14 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> > > the latest upload of screen-message contains a fix for a problem
>that
>> > > appeared due to some unidentified dependency change a few months
>ago,
>> > > likely gtk. The problem was communicated to me directly and fixed
>right
>> > > away, so there is no bug report for this.
>> > 
>> > It doesn't look like 0.23 is in the archive yet?
>> 
>> indeed, but how did that happen? I have a signed changes and an
>upload
>> log here, from 2014-12-23 (attached to prove myself I’m not crazy),
>but
>> I don’t find mails from the archive bots about it.
>> 
>> @ftp-master: Can you tell what I did wrong?
>
>Not ftp-master, but the queued log says:
>
>Dec 23 18:58:25 processing /screen-message_0.23-1_amd64.changes
>Dec 23 18:58:25 GnuPG signature check failed on
>screen-message_0.23-1_amd64.changes
>Dec 23 18:58:25 /screen-message_0.23-1_amd64.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG
>signature!
>Dec 23 18:58:25 Removing /screen-message_0.23-1_amd64.changes, but
>keeping its associated files for now.
>Dec 24 19:02:46 Deleted stray file /screen-message_0.23.orig.tar.gz
>Dec 24 19:02:46 Deleted stray file /screen-message_0.23-1.dsc
>Dec 24 19:02:46 Deleted stray file /screen-message_0.23-1.debian.tar.xz
>
>Regards,
>
>Adam


Reply to: