On 2014-12-19 6:08, Martin Pitt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +0000]:Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack.It still didn't propagate, I guess the d-i ack didn't happen yet?
Indeed. There'd generally be a follow-up to the bug if it had.
-8 does not change any udev code or the udebs, so d-i should be rather unaffected?
Nevertheless we were asked to get acks for all udeb-producing packages. Regards, Adam