Bug#773063: pre-approval unblock: quotatool/1.4.12-1.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jan, Jonathan,
On 14-12-2014 12:54 , Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
>>> Could you please state if you would approve to update the
>>> quotatool package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a
>>> blocking release in unstable.
>>>
>>> This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack
>>> for jessie again as the package is actually not in testing.
>
>> Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package
>> that was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think
>> people might be surprised that we shipped without a working
>> quotatool.
>
>> However I'm not prepared to accept it through t-p-u. The version
>> in unstable should be reverted with an epoch, and get the full
>> 10 days ageing period.
Jonathan, thanks for allowing this. I'm aware that I've left
quotatool to rot for way too long :(
> it would be nice if you could handle that.
>
>> (The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload"
>> signed by the maintainer, defeats me completely...)
>
> I think it would be more reasonable for RM when the actual
> maintainer can deal with this?
Sure, I will take this up. Hopefully, I'll be able to upload a
reverted, epoched version by tomorrow.
Thanks Jan, for contacting the release tema on my behalf!
Bas.
- --
Bas Zoetekouw
And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat
What dread hand and what dread feet?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)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=8kHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: