[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#773034: marked as done (nmu: tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:26:01 +0000
with message-id <20141213202601.GK17312@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#773034: nmu: tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #773034,
regarding nmu: tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
773034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new binutils."

As ususally after a new binutils upload ...


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 02:47:21PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu tulip_4.6.0dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new binutils."
> 
> As ususally after a new binutils upload ...

Scheduled.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: