Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:18:14 +0000 with message-id <20141212211814.GF17312@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#772798: nmu: smartmontools_6.3+svn4002-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #772798, regarding nmu: smartmontools_6.3+svn4002-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 772798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772798 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: smartmontools_6.3+svn4002-2
- From: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:05:46 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20141211080546.4537.7298.reportbug@sd6-work.iuculano.it>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu smartmontools_6.3+svn4002-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new binutils see #728113" As Kurt Roeckx suggested we need to rebuild smartmontools, see #728113 Cheers, Giuseppe
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Giuseppe Iuculano <iuculano@debian.org>, 772798-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#772798: nmu: smartmontools_6.3+svn4002-2
- From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:18:14 +0000
- Message-id: <20141212211814.GF17312@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 548B00B1.1070809@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20141211080546.4537.7298.reportbug@sd6-work.iuculano.it> <[🔎] 20141211213132.GB17312@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <[🔎] 548B00B1.1070809@debian.org>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:50:25PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > On 11/12/2014 22:31, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Is this an intended rebuild in Jessie or sid? > > In sid. Scheduled. -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---