[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#772634: resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes REJECTED



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 09/12/14 19:20, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec  9, 2014 at 19:08:59 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/12/14 14:27, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> 
>>> On Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2014, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>>> Your upload included the source package resiprocate,
>>>>> version 1.9.7-2, however unstable already has version
>>>>> 1.9.8-1.
>>>> Please assist me - I need to upload 1.9.7-2 to unstable as 
>>>> discussed with the release team
>>> 
>>> You need to use an epoch (so 0:1.9.7-2 or maybe 1:1.9.7-2) or 
>>> 1.9.8really1.9.7-1 - pick your poison :)
>>> 
>>> And check with "dpkg --compare-versions" before uploading.
>> 
>> Thanks for the feedback Holger.
>> 
>> I tried this:
>> 
>> resiprocate (1:1.9.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>> 
>> and received a "Processing" email but no accepted/rejected
>> notification
>> 
> Dec  9 18:07:17 processing /resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes Dec
> 9 18:07:17 /resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes is already present on
> target host: Dec  9 18:07:17 sipdialer_1.9.7-2_amd64.deb Dec  9
> 18:07:17 Job resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes removed.
> 
> Don't reuse the same debian revision.

That was another attempt to upload the same 1:1.9.7-2 artifacts

I notice that it didn't put the epoch in the filenames but it is in
the changes file

1:1.9.7-2 was originally uploaded at 14:01



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=btHz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: