[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#771643: marked as done (unblock: python-passlib/1.6.1-1.3)



Your message dated Wed, 3 Dec 2014 23:58:24 +0100
with message-id <20141203225824.GA5548@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#771643: unblock: python-passlib/1.6.1-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #771643,
regarding unblock: python-passlib/1.6.1-1.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
771643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package python-passlib

This should have got into testing anyway, but had an incomplete
debian/copyright file, that resulted in RC bug #752080. It looks like
the version in testing has the same problem.

Version 1.6.1-1.1 adds Python 3 packages and some dependancies.

Version 1.6.1-1.2 adds a missing dependancy. This was a good version
apart from this error and has received months of testing in unstable.

Version 1.6.1-1.3 amends the copyright file. It just got accepted into
Debian unstable.

Unfortunately, as I am not the official mantainer, I didn't notice this
RC bug until about an hour ago.

Thanks


diff -Nru python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/changelog python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/changelog
--- python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/changelog	2014-06-18 13:17:03.000000000 +1000
+++ python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/changelog	2014-12-01 16:57:53.000000000 +1100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+python-passlib (1.6.1-1.3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add missing licenses. Closes: #752080.
+
+ -- Brian May <bam@debian.org>  Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:57:16 +1100
+
 python-passlib (1.6.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload, with permission.
diff -Nru python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/copyright python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/copyright
--- python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/copyright	2014-06-18 08:55:50.000000000 +1000
+++ python-passlib-1.6.1/debian/copyright	2014-12-01 17:05:23.000000000 +1100
@@ -10,6 +10,53 @@
 Copyright: 2011 Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
 License: BSD-3-Clause
 
+Files: passlib/handlers/md5_crypt.py
+Copyright: phk@login.dknet.dk
+License: BEER-WARE
+ "THE BEER-WARE LICENSE" (Revision 42):
+ <phk@login.dknet.dk> wrote this file.  As long as you retain this notice you
+ can do whatever you want with this stuff. If we meet some day, and you think
+ this stuff is worth it, you can buy me a beer in return.   Poul-Henning Kamp
+ .
+ converted to python May 2008
+ by Eli Collins
+
+Files: passlib/utils/des.py
+Copyright: 1996 Aki Yoshida
+License: Aki-Yoshida
+ UnixCrypt.java 0.9 96/11/25
+ Copyright (c) 1996 Aki Yoshida. All rights reserved.
+ Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software
+ for non-commercial or commercial purposes and without fee is
+ hereby granted provided that this copyright notice appears in
+ all copies.
+ .
+ modified April 2001
+ by Iris Van den Broeke, Daniel Deville
+ .
+ modified Aug 2005
+ by Greg Wilkins (gregw)
+ .
+ converted to python Jun 2009
+ by Eli Collins
+
+Files: passlib/utils/_blowfish/base.py
+Copyright: 2006 Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
+License: Damien-Miller
+ Copyright (c) 2006 Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
+ .
+ Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
+ purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
+ copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
+ .
+ THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
+ WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
+ MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
+ ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
+ WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
+ ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
+ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
+
 License: BSD-3-Clause
  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
  modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions

unblock python-passlib/1.6.1-1.3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:39:29AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On 4 December 2014 at 08:16, Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> wrote:
> 
>   > Version 1.6.1-1.1 adds Python 3 packages and some dependancies.A 
> 
>   This kind of change is not acceptable during the freeze. The fact that this
> 
>   change was in unstable for a long time doesn't really matter at this point.
> 
> Hello,
> I can't help but wonder if you have really understood the situation - I can't
> just upload a new package to unstable that drops the Python3 packages - this
> *will* breaks things in unstable (e.g. my python3-tldap package that depends on
> python3-passlib).
> Anyway there is no point for me to fix #752080A if the package doesn't have
> Python3 support. You are asking me to revert the fix for #751758, which was far
> more serious IMHO. It just won't satisfy the dependencies of my packages any
> more.
> If this is going to be the attitude that the package can't get into Jessie due
> to a trivial documentation bug that was ignored by the maintainer, I am going to
> have to rebuild the Python3 package myself anyway.

We only care about what's in testing, not in unstable. I understand it's
frustrating for you that the package didn't migrate when it was still
possible, but we can't change that now. Sorry.

> I really don't care aboutA #752080 myself; I question if it even is an RC bug.
> Thanks anyway.

Cheers,

Ivo

--- End Message ---

Reply to: