On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:39:56PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, November 28, 2014 08:17:26 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 07:29:46PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > Upstream is in the process of preparing a new feature release that is > > > clearly unsuitable for the freeze, but it also contains quite a few > > > bug fixes that are either important from a correct performance (and > > > potentially security) perspective or very low risk and highly likely to > > > be useful to sysadmins making use of the package. > > > > > > I've gone through and evaluated which changes I think would be good > > > to get into Jessie (see attached upstream diff). Depending on upstream's > > > reaction to this, this would either be version 2.9.3 or patches to our > > > existing 2.9.2. Before I approach upstream and push for another bug fix > > > release that they don't currently plan, I'd like feedback on what, if any > > > of the attached would be suitable for Jessie. > > > > All the proposed changes look fine to me. How do you want to proceed? > > Given the closeness to the important fix deadline, I'll just upload a patched > 2.9.2. Ok, please remove the moreinfo tag when it's ready for processing. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature