Bug#771127: marked as done (What shall we do for the sphinxcontrib diag stuff?)
Your message dated Thu, 27 Nov 2014 19:40:54 +0100
with message-id <54777036.5000404@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#771127: What shall we do for the sphinxcontrib diag stuff?
has caused the Debian Bug report #771127,
regarding What shall we do for the sphinxcontrib diag stuff?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
771127: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear release team,
There's a number of sphinxcontrib package which have RC bugs in Jessie,
because of missing build-depends. Namely:
- #768707 [S|+P| ] [src:sphinxcontrib-blockdiag]
- #768708 [S|+P| ] [src:sphinxcontrib-nwdiag]
- #768739 [S|+P| ] [src:sphinxcontrib-actdiag]
- #768765 [S|+P| ] [src:sphinxcontrib-seqdiag]
On all of the 4 cases, the issue is that python-sphinx-testing, and
python3-sphinx-testing didn't make it on time for the release.
So we have 2 ways to fix the issue:
- 1/ Allow python-sphinx-testing to get in Jessie
- 2/ Remove all sphinx-testing tests and build-depends from the above
4 packages, and unblock them from Sid so that they migrate to Jessie.
It is my understanding that the goal of the distribution freeze is to
improve Q/A. sphinx-testing is just there for Q/A, so makes a lot of
sense to allow it to get in Jessie. It doesn't serve any other purpose
but providing Q/A for the above 4 packages. Not allowing it to get in,
and choosing option 2 wouldn't help improving quality, quite the
opposite. The only reason why you would refuse to get sphinx-testing in,
would be because you just want to respect establish rules and not make
exception (which I would understand, but not support).
I do understand all the freeze stuff and rules, though since we all
have a limited amount of time available, option 1 seems more reasonable.
That's just a single unblock, vs 4 uploads (possibly NMU) and 4 matching
unblocks...
In any ways, I would like to act fast on this current issue so that the
packages gets in Jessie, so please let me know your release team view
here.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-11-27 01:08, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear release team,
>
> There's a number of sphinxcontrib package which have RC bugs in Jessie,
> because of missing build-depends. Namely:
>
> [...]
>
> On all of the 4 cases, the issue is that python-sphinx-testing, and
> python3-sphinx-testing didn't make it on time for the release.
>
> So we have 2 ways to fix the issue:
> - 1/ Allow python-sphinx-testing to get in Jessie
> - 2/ Remove all sphinx-testing tests and build-depends from the above
> 4 packages, and unblock them from Sid so that they migrate to Jessie.
>
> It is my understanding that the goal of the distribution freeze is to
> improve Q/A. sphinx-testing is just there for Q/A, so makes a lot of
> sense to allow it to get in Jessie. It doesn't serve any other purpose
> but providing Q/A for the above 4 packages. Not allowing it to get in,
> and choosing option 2 wouldn't help improving quality, quite the
> opposite. The only reason why you would refuse to get sphinx-testing in,
> would be because you just want to respect establish rules and not make
> exception (which I would understand, but not support).
>
> I do understand all the freeze stuff and rules, though since we all
> have a limited amount of time available, option 1 seems more reasonable.
> That's just a single unblock, vs 4 uploads (possibly NMU) and 4 matching
> unblocks...
>
> In any ways, I would like to act fast on this current issue so that the
> packages gets in Jessie, so please let me know your release team view
> here.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand
>
>
Hi Thomas,
Sorry, we will go with option 2.
I admit I would have preferred that the testing package had made it in
time - but it did not.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: