[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#771055: marked as done (unblock: diagnostics/0.3.3-10)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:26:55 +0000
with message-id <20141126222655.GC14483@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#771055: unblock: diagnostics/0.3.3-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #771055,
regarding unblock: diagnostics/0.3.3-10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
771055: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771055
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Is there a chance that diagnostics 0.3.3-10 could be allowed back into testing
as it had been auto-removed due to RC bugs in its dependency ace? ace itself has
meanwhile migrated back into testing (with the RC bugs fixed), and hence it
would be great if diagnostics were allowed back in as well.

The history is as follows:
- diagnostics was removed from testing on 2014-08-26 due to:
  #746825: ace: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
- ace migrated back into testing 2014-11-01
- Presumably the freeze on 2014-11-05 was too early for diagnostics to migrate
  back!?

Thanks a lot in advance,
Michael

unblock diagnostics/0.3.3-10

Attachment: pgp0E5xVULSNw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:21:01AM +0000, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Is there a chance that diagnostics 0.3.3-10 could be allowed back into testing
> as it had been auto-removed due to RC bugs in its dependency ace? ace itself has
> meanwhile migrated back into testing (with the RC bugs fixed), and hence it
> would be great if diagnostics were allowed back in as well.

Hm...... ok.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: