Bug#769204: unblock: d3/3.4.13-2

[Ludovico Cavedon <cavedon@debian.org>]

Hi,

On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:23:14 +0100
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= <gcs@debian.org>
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:54 PM, W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org> wrote:
> > On 2014-11-14 12:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:15:57 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> >> > Package: release.debian.org
> >> > Severity: normal
> >> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> >> > Usertags: unblock
> >> >
> >> I don't think this is suitable, sorry.
> >>
> >> My preferred solution right now is to remove d3/3.4.11-1
> >> flower/0.7.0+dfsg-1 python-mne/0.8.4+dfsg-1
> >> python-mpld3/0.3git+20140910dfsg-1 python-xstatic-d3/3.4.11-1
> >> rickshaw/1.5.0.dfsg-1 ruby-sidekiq/3.2.6~dfsg-1 ntopng/1.2.1+dfsg1-1.1
> >> python-xstatic-rickshaw/1.5.0.2-2.

I am the maintainer of ntopng.
Please do not remove it from testing, but let me know how if I can
help avoiding the revmoval.

> > As both co-maintainer of python-mpld3 and user of both rickshaw
> > and D3, I'm not very happy about this solution. As I understand,
> > the main problem is, that D3 is a newer upstream, which was not
> > in testing in time, right? How about downgrading D3 to
> > 1:3.4.11-2 with just the RC bug fixed?
>  Sure, it could be done via t-p-u if Julien allows it.

Julien, would that be ok?
László, let me know if I can help.

Thanks,
Ludovico