[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#770723: marked as done (unblock: drbd-utils/8.9.2~rc1-2)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:01:45 +0000
with message-id <1416762105.8259.28.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#770723: unblock: drbd-utils/8.9.2~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #770723,
regarding unblock: drbd-utils/8.9.2~rc1-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
770723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770723
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package drbd-utils

8.9.2~rc1-2 fixes an FTBFS when corrupted docbook DTDs are being 
downloaded by xsltproc from the internet, see #768881. Since downloading 
these files should never happen in the first place, we build-depend on 
docbook-xml to have the DTDs installed locally during the build.

Additionally, this version adds a missing build-dependency on udev, also 
reported in #768881, that could potentially lead in the udev rules file 
not being shipped in certain cases.

See the attached debdiff for full details.

unblock drbd-utils/8.9.2~rc1-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

diff -Nru drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/changelog drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/changelog
--- drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/changelog	2014-10-14 10:39:56.000000000 +0300
+++ drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/changelog	2014-11-23 17:40:27.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+drbd-utils (8.9.2~rc1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Build-Depend on docbook-xml to avoid fetching the docbook DTDs from the
+    internet (closes: #768881).
+  * Build-Depend on udev to avoid shipping a disabled rules file in case the
+    build system does not find udevadm or udevinfo.
+
+ -- Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org>  Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:30:02 +0200
+
 drbd-utils (8.9.2~rc1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release candidate.
diff -Nru drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/control drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/control
--- drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/control	2014-10-14 10:26:52.000000000 +0300
+++ drbd-utils-8.9.2~rc1/debian/control	2014-11-23 17:40:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  Philipp Hug <debian@hug.cx>,
  Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), flex, xsltproc, dh-systemd (>= 1.5),
- docbook-xsl
+ docbook-xsl, docbook-xml, udev
 Standards-Version: 3.9.6
 Homepage: http://www.drbd.org/
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-ha/drbd-utils.git

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 18:10 +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> On 16:06 Sun 23 Nov     , Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > 
> > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 17:52 +0200, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > > Please unblock package drbd-utils
> > > 
> > > 8.9.2~rc1-2 fixes an FTBFS when corrupted docbook DTDs are being 
> > > downloaded by xsltproc from the internet, see #768881. Since downloading 
> > > these files should never happen in the first place, we build-depend on 
> > > docbook-xml to have the DTDs installed locally during the build.
> > > 
> > > Additionally, this version adds a missing build-dependency on udev, also 
> > > reported in #768881, that could potentially lead in the udev rules file 
> > > not being shipped in certain cases.
> > 
> > It doesn't look like this has been uploaded yet?
> 
> I did the upload about 20 minutes ago, it should appear shortly.

and apparently Niels unblocked it already.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: