[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#767266: marked as done (unblock: plymouth/0.9.0-9)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:51:13 +0100
with message-id <20141119215113.GA20413@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#767266: unblock: plymouth/0.9.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #767266,
regarding unblock: plymouth/0.9.0-9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
767266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello,

I was wondering if the release team would allow to unblock plymouth if
I was adding an extra plymouth-label (or plymouth-plugin-label) package.

I know it's late, but this would allow to have 3rd party themes
installed (like the desktop base one) without pulling the
plymouth-themes package. Moving the module to the main plymouth package
is not a solution either as it pulls Xlibs and more and I would like to
keep the dependency of the main plymouth package as low as possible.

See: #767170 and #764644.

Cheers,

Laurent Bigonville

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Hi Laurent,

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:01:08AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> retitle 767266 unblock: plymouth/0.9.0-9
> thanks

You forgot to remove the moreinfo tag, so this request wasn't at the top of
our the todo list.

> Could you please unblock plymouth/0.9.0-9 that has been now uploaded to
> unstable.
> 
> The scope of this unblock request has changed a bit, but I think the
> changes are quite minimal.
> 
> The issue mentioned in the initial request (initramfs generation
> failing in some conditions) has been fixed as well but with a less
> invasive way than creating a new package as initially thought.

Unblocked.

Cheers,

Ivo

--- End Message ---
Reply to: