[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#769122: marked as done (unblock: qpid-proton/0.7-8)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:48:19 +0000
with message-id <20141118194819.GO6216@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#769122: unblock: qpid-proton/0.7-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #769122,
regarding unblock: qpid-proton/0.7-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
769122: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package qpid-proton

The reason it failed to build from source was due to it having a dependency on libsslcommon2-dev. However, this dependency can instead by met by libssl-dev which does exist in Jessie.

unblock qpid-proton/0.7-8

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 01:37:07PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
> 
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 07:33:57AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:55:00AM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > The debdiff doesn't show your adding the python helper?
> > 
> > I had sent the wrong one, before I had added the python helper. I sent a
> > second email but not sure why it's not attached to the bug. Here is the
> > correct one:
> 
> Ok, that looks fine apart from getting rid of the now-empty lintian
> override file.

It was sponsored; unblocked.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: