Bug#767202: pu: package sysvinit/2.88dsf-41+deb7u1: bootlogd log on multiple consoles
- To: 767202@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#767202: pu: package sysvinit/2.88dsf-41+deb7u1: bootlogd log on multiple consoles
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:59:44 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 5467E8F0.6000604@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>, 767202@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20141029092700.18734.68367.reportbug__45249.820550862$1414575031$gmane$org@buzig.gplhost.com>
- References: <20141029092700.18734.68367.reportbug__45249.820550862$1414575031$gmane$org@buzig.gplhost.com>
On 10/29/2014 05:27 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I'm opening a bug as suggested by KiBi.
>
> I would like to close bug #181756, which contains a patch that I forward
> ported to Sid last summer, and uploaded in sysvinit 2.88dsf-53.4. The
> patch is available here (in the bug report):
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=51;filename=allow-multiple-console-output.patch;att=1;bug=181756
>
> This patch is important because if you use a server, you may want to activate
> serial console boot log. It is also very important for cloud computing. For
> example, with OpenStack, bootlogd must log on both tty0 and ttyS0 to have both
> "nova console-log" and the interactive web terminal to work. Otherwise, it is
> always the last console= argument on the command line that is in use.
>
> Nobody reported any issue since my upload to Sid on the 24th of August. I also
> tested the patch in Wheezy on a Xen VPS, and using OpenStack on virtual machine
> instances. Both ran without any issue.
>
> If the release team agree that I add the patch to the Wheezy version of
> bootlogd, then I will prepare a package and send links to both the package
> itself, and the debdiff for pre-approval, before uploading to stable p-u.
>
> Please let me know your thoughts about this,
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
I know everyone is busy with Jessie's release, however, this fix in
Wheezy is important for me (and others). Could someone from the release
team have a look and let me know if this change is acceptable for an
upload in proposed-updates? Again, I believe that I did *a lot* of tests
(and in fact, I use the patched version every day), so it should be safe.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: