[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#769401: marked as done (unblock: coinutils/2.9.15-3)



Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:34:22 +0100
with message-id <546523DE.3010800@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#769401: unblock: coinutils/2.9.15-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #769401,
regarding unblock: coinutils/2.9.15-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
769401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769401
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package coinutils/2.9.15-3:
  * Team upload.
  * Add liblapack-dev for coinor-libcoinutils-dev to make sure -llapack
    and -lblas exist as required in the pkgconfig file (Closes: #768753)

Bug #768753 is new RC and it is in the reverse dependency chain of
libreoffice, thus need such a fix.

unblock coinutils/2.9.15-3

Best,
Aron

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-11-13 13:29, Aron Xu wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package coinutils/2.9.15-3:
>   * Team upload.
>   * Add liblapack-dev for coinor-libcoinutils-dev to make sure -llapack
>     and -lblas exist as required in the pkgconfig file (Closes: #768753)
> 
> Bug #768753 is new RC and it is in the reverse dependency chain of
> libreoffice, thus need such a fix.
> 
> unblock coinutils/2.9.15-3
> 
> Best,
> Aron
> 
> 

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: