On 2014-11-12 8:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: [...]
In the Jessie freeze policy, we instead have:"translation updates and documentation fixes, via TPU when included with otherTPU-applicable fixes. (until the 5th of January 2015)"[2] To me this reads as:- translation updates and documentation fixes are fine in unstable until the 5thof January- translation updates and documentation fixes are fine in t-p-u until the 5th of January, *only* if accompanied by other fixes that meet the t-p-u criteriaThis indeed matches the old description, which was clarified in 42b55359d12ed5c70a53ac041fedaa45b1e729ad.
ftr, I don't believe that it does match the old description, which is why I clarified it. It's possible that it matches the intent, but that's another question. :-)
Specifically, if the above is what was intended, then I don't see why there are two separate items with separate (but identical dates); if that's the correct interpretation then the first bullet point is redundant and pointless - i.e. we could simply have had (modulo the typo from the original draft document):
+ <li>translation updates and documentation fixes, (<b>until FREEZE + 2 mont TODO</b>;
+ <ol>+ <li>Allowed in TPU when done together with other TPU-applicable fixes.</li>
+ </ol> + </li> without the second "included with fixes for the above criteria" item. The wheezy policy had<li>translation updates and documentation fixes that are included with fixes
for the above criteria.</li> <li>translation updates and documentation fixes;</li>but that made sense because the criteria were dropped from the list of acceptable changes at different dates. It's possible that introduced confusion while drafting the jessie policy.
Regards, Adam