[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#768930: unblock: pynag and syslog-nagios-bridge



Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-10 12:19:19 -0800:
> 
> On 10/11/14 20:56, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:31:03 +0100 Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> syslog-nagios-bridge requires pynag 0.9.1+, older versions have a bug in
> >> check result file generation:
> >>
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768928
> >>
> >>
> >> I added a constraint in syslog-nagios-bridge well before the freeze so
> >> it would not propagate to testing until pynag 0.9.1 was uploaded:
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763378
> >>
> >> Note that the pynag upload in unstable is also cleaning out minified
> >> jquery and other things that make the package more compliant with Debian
> >> policy
> >>
> >>
> >> [...]
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am afraid I will have to reject this request in its current form.
> > 
> > The changes to pynag is beyond what can be reasonably reviewed and
> > indeed it is not a targeted fix for #768928.  The changes to
> > syslog-nagios-bridge are reasonable and I could accept them, but I
> > understand it is of no use without pynag as well.
> > 
> > Can you please provide a targeted fix for pynag?
> 
> This (just a few lines) could be dropped into
> debian/patches/checkresult_fix.patch
> 
> https://github.com/pynag/pynag/commit/3aad1176bca4b2f39c2c851396d30647efbf2bed
> 
> Clint, would you be happy to upload 0.8.9 with that or would you like me
> to NMU perhaps?
> 
> Or is there any reason why the whole 0.9.1 should be considered for jessie?

I think we should unblock 0.9.1.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: