[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#768646: marked as done (unblock: owfs/2.9p8-5)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2014 13:12:01 +0000
with message-id <20141109131201.GH2830@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#768646: unblock: owfs/2.9p8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #768646,
regarding unblock: owfs/2.9p8-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
768646: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768646
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package owfs

  Hi,

  owfs is missing a Breaks/Replaces that should have been added when
two programs (and their manpage) move from one binary package to a new one.
This fix #768115 (severity serious) and the debdiff is rather small (two lines
for the added Breaks/Replaces in debian/control and an entry in the changelog)
  #768115 has been filled to late (5 Nov 2014) to fix it before the freeze (I
did not realize the problem before the bugreport whereas it is here since
2014-07-07)

$ debdiff owfs_2.9p8-4.dsc owfs_2.9p8-5.dsc
diff -Nru owfs-2.9p8/debian/changelog owfs-2.9p8/debian/changelog
--- owfs-2.9p8/debian/changelog	2014-10-27 08:21:03.000000000 +0100
+++ owfs-2.9p8/debian/changelog	2014-11-08 23:15:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+owfs (2.9p8-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add missing Breaks/Replaces required due to some files moved
+    from the ow-shell package to the ow-tools one. This move occures
+    in 2.9p5-1 (Closes: #768115)
+
+ -- Vincent Danjean <vdanjean@debian.org>  Sat, 08 Nov 2014 23:09:09 +0100
+
 owfs (2.9p8-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Fix "FTBFS[kfreebsd]: wrong ifdef __FreeBSD__" : using the good
diff -Nru owfs-2.9p8/debian/control owfs-2.9p8/debian/control
--- owfs-2.9p8/debian/control	2014-10-27 08:21:03.000000000 +0100
+++ owfs-2.9p8/debian/control	2014-11-08 23:15:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@
 Package: ow-tools
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, tk
+Breaks: ow-shell (<<2.9p5)
+Replaces: ow-shell (<<2.9p5)
 Suggests: owserver
 Description: tools to monitor or inspect a ow-server link
  The 1-Wire bus is a cheap low-speed bus for devices like weather

  Regards,
    Vincent

unblock owfs/2.9p8-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
armel
mipsel

Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:49:16PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>   owfs is missing a Breaks/Replaces that should have been added when
> two programs (and their manpage) move from one binary package to a new one.
> This fix #768115 (severity serious) and the debdiff is rather small (two lines
> for the added Breaks/Replaces in debian/control and an entry in the changelog)
>   #768115 has been filled to late (5 Nov 2014) to fix it before the freeze (I
> did not realize the problem before the bugreport whereas it is here since
> 2014-07-07)

Unblocked.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: