Bug#767199: marked as done (unblock: gvb/1.4-1)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:10:36 +0100
with message-id <545149BC.3070102@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#767199: unblock: gvb/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #767199,
regarding unblock: gvb/1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
767199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gvb
This release does not add any features, it simply adapts to new gtk and python, fixes documentation, cleans some code, closes #722271. And it is excluded from the "natural" migration to testing by just 1 day!
unblock gvb/1.4-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (600, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 2014-10-29 08:54, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package gvb
>
> This release does not add any features, it simply adapts to new gtk and python, fixes documentation, cleans some code, closes #722271. And it is excluded from the "natural" migration to testing by just 1 day!
>
> unblock gvb/1.4-1
>
> [...]
Hi Pietro,
It seems that gvb *was uploaded in time* to have a /chance/ to migrate
on its own. By my calculation, it should reach age 10/10 on the 5th of
November on the last Britney run of the day. Provided Britney asserts
your package as valid and safe to migrate, gvb/1.4-1 should do so
without any intervention on our part.
However, should it fail to migrate I am afraid I will have to decline
your request. The changes between the current version of gvb in testing
and gvb/1.4-1 are /not/ compatible with our freeze guidelines.
Yours truly,
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: