Bug#767082: marked as done (unblock: exifprobe/2.0.1-3)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:30:47 +0000
with message-id <1414528247.12825.12.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#767082: unblock: exifprobe/2.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #767082,
regarding unblock: exifprobe/2.0.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
767082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package exifprobe.
The package was orphan and I did a QA upload on 2014-08-24. Yesterday
I adopted (under the Forensics Team) and uploaded the package to Sid.
I Solved all bugs (4 bugs) and Lintian warnings (15 messages). The
changelog is here[1].
The package is useful in forensics activities, is clean and working
fine. I believe that is a good idea have this package in Jessie and
I need a reduction of the migration time to 8 days.
This will be my last request of reduction. I no need this for other
packages.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Eriberto
unblock exifprobe/2.0.1-3
[1] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/e/exifprobe/unstable_changelog
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 16:31 -0200, Eriberto wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. Yes, I updated the whole package. However, this
> solves 4 bugs and several warnings. I put all changes in
> d/copyright[1] (you will can see the changes and bugs).
I think you mean d/changelog. ;-)
> The patch provided by bug #597123 is essential to a proper functioning
> of the exifgrep command, provided by exifprobe.
Having looked at that, okay. However, a further upload before -3
migrates is unlikely to get the same treatment.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: