Bug#767085: marked as done (unblock: pcl/1.7.2-2)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:05:54 +0100
with message-id <544FF722.7060300@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#767085: unblock: pcl/1.7.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767085,
regarding unblock: pcl/1.7.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
767085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please reduce the 10-day age period to 9 (or less) of this package. Let me
explain the situation:
We have worked hard with a big package: pcl. The package goes to new queue
on June (2014-06-10). It was about 4 months.
- It was rejected because problems in the copyright file. (2014-10-03)
- Upstream in the middle releases a new version. (2014-09-10)
- We worked with the new version and I asked my sponsor to upload it on
Wednesday. (2014-10-15)
- My sponsor upload it on Wednesday (2014-10-22) and ftp-masters upload it to
unstable on Friday. (2014-10-24)
- The same day, a few hours after to be in unstable, someone filled a Important
bug of one binary package #766685: libpcl-dev
- A few hours after I prepare a new version of the package solving the bug and
I uploaded to mentors the new package, commented the bug and asked to my sponsor to
upload the package (2014-10-25). However, I made a mistake and I put UNRELEASED so my
sponsor rejects to upload it.
- On Sunday morning (2014-10-26 Morning (UTC)) I asked to my sponsor to
upload the new version, thinking that the period to have a package in testing
before November 5th ended Sunday 26th 23:55 (UTC) (November 5th - 10 days). My
sponsor upload it this morning 5:57, day 27th.
I don't know if someone will fill any bug against the package before November 5th.
I hope that no. But, we are not in time to be in testing before freeze because
6 hours... so it won't be in Jessie.
Please, could you reduced the 10-day delay?
Thanks in advance.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (600, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On 2014-10-28 12:10, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please reduce the 10-day age period to 9 (or less) of this package. Let me
> explain the situation:
>
> [...]
>
> Please, could you reduced the 10-day delay?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> [...]
I suspect you have made a mistake in the calculation of the deadline.
AFAICT, pcl will have age 10/10 on the 5th in the second Britney run
giving it *one shot* at migrating to testing (providing nothing blocks
it)[2].
Mind you, if it misses that chance, you will truly have missed the
deadline and then pcl will /not/ be included in Jessie.
~Niels
[1] I do not say this to be mean, but we have to set the cut-off at some
point.
[2] If I am not mistaken, it will get age 2/10 tonight (in ~3-4 hours
from now).
--- End Message ---
Reply to: