On 10/13/2014 02:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Will dinifti be removed from the distribution ? Do you need me to do something ? Removing the dependency from the ctn library is no small job.On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 19:04 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:46:10PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:# Broken Build-Depends: ctsim: ctn-dev dicomnifti: ctn-dev (> 3.0.6-9) The set of ctn, ctsim and dicomnifti is closed, so we could "just" remove the three. Alternatively someone could fix the package to not need / contain the file (note that I've not looked at the feasibility of that).It is in fact very easy to drop the file in question which is not used in ctn 3.2.0 any more. We did so in Jessie. However, I personally do not want to do the possibly needed backporting and I have no problems to remove these three packages from stable considering that they are really low popcon packages and users could cherry pick from testing if they really need the package. I keep Neurodebian team in CC since they might have a different release strategy. Feel free to do whatever does not create any work for me. ;-)I must admit I'm not sure whether the follow-ups to this from Valerio were in relation to the stable removal or not. In any case, we're now less than a week away from a point release so unless anyone yells to the contrary very soon I'm minded to remove all three packages from wheezy as per Andreas's mail. Regards, Adam --
"In an open world, who needs windows or gates ?" |