[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#763514: marked as done (unblock: dbus/1.8.8-1 systemd/215-5)

Your message dated Mon, 6 Oct 2014 00:11:40 +0200
with message-id <20141005221140.GF8555@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#763514: unblock: dbus/1.8.8-1 systemd/215-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #763514,
regarding unblock: dbus/1.8.8-1 systemd/215-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763514: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763514
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

dbus in unstable has some security fixes which aren't migrating because
it's stuck behind libsystemd0, and because both dbus and systemd produce
udebs. Please consider lifting the block-udeb and maybe bumping systemd's
urgency, either before Jessie beta 2 or immediately after, depending
how soon that's going to be (X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot to decide which way
to go).

As far as I'm aware, these udebs are there to support accessibility (ATK)
in the graphical installer.

This might be the right syntax:

unblock dbus/1.8.8-1
unblock systemd/215-5

Thanks,
    S

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> (2014-09-30):
> On 30/09/14 18:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > TL;DR: nack for now.
> 
> Sure, no problem. Hopefully lifting the block-udeb in the normal way
> after the beta will be enough to resolve this.
> 
> > According to my fuzzy memory (and past excuses files), the root
> > reason is that systemd hasn't been a candidate in a while (too
> > young and/or RC buggy).
> 
> Yes, it had RC bugs for a while but they seem to have been addressed
> in unstable now. It's still a bit too new though (2/5 days).
> 
> > (systemd means udev-udeb, nothing something I'd like to rush in at
> > the last minute.)
> 
> I'd forgotten about udev-udeb, and yes, that's a good reason to not
> rush it!
> 
> > FWIW it might be a nice idea to coordinate such requests with
> > Michael since I already replied on that topic on #-release earlier
> > today…
> 
> Sorry, I should have mentioned that I filed this in response to IRC
> discussion with Michael (about some lower-priority dbus changes which
> I didn't want uploaded until it migrates), and I had X-Debbugs-Cc'd
> him in the bug report.

Both are in, closing.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: