On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 20:48:31 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I hope we could leave it as that for the upload - nobody has a time > > machine to undo the upload, but we could try to make it better now and > > discuss where we should go. > > Ok, let's focus on libjpeg-progs, since I do not think there is a disagreement > about it. What would you propose as a course of action that allow either > libjpeg8 or lijpeg9 to provide libjpeg-progs with minimal disruption to the > archive ? > libjpeg8 can start building an epoched libjpeg-progs. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature