[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#763418: marked as done (nmu: pyzmq_14.3.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:49:36 +0200
with message-id <542A8AC0.9070607@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#763418: nmu: pyzmq_14.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #763418,
regarding nmu: pyzmq_14.3.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
763418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763418
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

I might have had a little mini-pypy transition, which affects one
package:

nmu pyzmq_14.3.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against PyPy 2.4.0"

I probably should have asked for a slot first. Bad tumbleweed. Sorry :(
I have just read the latest bits, and see the transition window has been
and gone.

SR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 30/09/14 07:01, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I might have had a little mini-pypy transition, which affects one
> package:
> 
> nmu pyzmq_14.3.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against PyPy 2.4.0"
> 
> I probably should have asked for a slot first. Bad tumbleweed. Sorry :(
> I have just read the latest bits, and see the transition window has been
> and gone.

Since this is just tight coupling between those two, I've scheduled it. Should
it have been a library transition or similar, I would have asked you to revert this.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: