Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org> (2014-09-28): > On 21:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> (2014-08-31): > > > However, I am planning to keep llvm 3.4 in the archive. So, packages > > > not supporting 3.5 won't be deleted. We will just have to force the > > > version 3.4. > > > > Moreover, switching toolchain defaults while we're trying to freeze > > library transitions doesn't look like a good idea; especially since > > 3.5 packages aren't exactly bug free. > > FWIW when building kfreebsd (kernel package) we already explicitly > depend on clang-3.4, in order to be not impacted by a change of default > such as this. Well I either knew or suspected that. That's what linux does as well. I was more rather referring to doxygen's being broken and hundreds of rc bugs as a consequence; some of which affecting packages I'm interested in (new brltty for example). Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature