On 27/09/2014 18:54, Andreas Barth
wrote:
The package name is libclang1-3.5* Sylvestre Ledru (sylvestre@debian.org) [140927 16:51]:nmu doxygen_1.8.7-3 . ALL . -m "binMNU because of the libclang change of soname" I updated the soname as part of the coordination to switch to llvm 3.5. https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.htmlDid you also switch the binary package name? For any soname change you need to have the package name to follow. See e.g. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html | Every time the shared library ABI changes in a way that may break | binaries linked against older versions of the shared library, the | SONAME of the library and the corresponding name for the binary | package containing the runtime shared library should change. Can you please do that so that we could schedule the binNMUs after this is done? and the soname is libclang-3.5.so.1 Initially, I uploaded with libclang-3.5.so as soname since the ABI remains the same over a version of libclang but dpkg-shlibdeps complained about the missing .1 even if it seems valid in the policy https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html "The soname may instead be of the form name-major-version.so, such as libdb-5.1.so, in which case the name would be libdb and the version would be 5.1. " What would you want in term of package naming ? I don't know what would work best here libclang-3.5.1 is kind of a bad name. If possible, I would prefer to keep the following naming and fix the doxygen breakage by the binNMU. Sylvestre |