Adam D. Barratt a écrit , Le 04/09/2014 23:51: > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 23:26 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> [resending because of a previously malformed address] >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:22:03 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> <pochu@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 12/06/14 21:51, Gilles Filippini wrote: >>>> nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . stable . -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261)" >>>> >>>> Hoping to get it right this time :/ >>> >>> Scheduled. This still needs to be accepted by the SRMs for the next point >>> release. >> >> I fail to see any move on this side. > > Then your vision is faulty. :) I was looking at the buildd log page [1] where the binNMU is reported 'Uploaded' (not 'Installed'). [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hdf5&suite=wheezy > >> Is there anything I could do to >> have this binNMU accepted into stable? > > Travel back to July this year, when the update was released. > > See https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140712 and > > libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9 | stable | armel, armhf, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc > libhdf5-7 | 1.8.8-9+b1 | stable | amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 Then I apologize for the noise :) Thanks, _g.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature