Bug#751939: marked as done (nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.65+dfsg-2)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:32:04 +0100
with message-id <1403364724.15857.22.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#751939: nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.65+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #751939,
regarding nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.65+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
751939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.65+dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild with libwxgtk3.0-dev 3.0.1"
dw libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.65+dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "libwxgtk3.0-dev (>= 3.0.1)"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:17 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:41:44 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
> > My guess is that since the package provides information about the
> > specific conditions under which the Wx library was built, it needs to
> > be rebuilt whenever the Wx library is changed.
> >
> > Maybe others in the group can provide more input, for example whether
> > depending on << 3.1 (i.e. ignore patchlevel changes) would be
> > sufficient.
>
> I looked at the file created in jessie and sidm so with
> libwxgtk3.0-dev 3.0.0-4 vs. 3.0.1-1.
[...]
> Not sure if this has a practical effect, but at least the exact
> version is recorded ...
Let's assume it does. Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: