Bug#726828: marked as done (transition: libgnutls-openssl27)
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:57:27 +0200
with message-id <20140619125727.GA6731@downhill.g.la>
and subject line Re: Bug#726828: transition: libgnutls-openssl27
has caused the Debian Bug report #726828,
regarding transition: libgnutls-openssl27
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
726828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libgnutls-openssl27
- From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:26:15 +0200
- Message-id: <20131019162615.GA25446@downhill.g.la>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to provide libgnutls-openssl27 from the gnutls28 source
package (up to date upstream version of GnuTLS). The binary package
name will not change, however the reverse dependencies will require a
sourceful upload to update the build-depency.
I have already done some testbuilds and and had a look at
debian/copyright of the involved packages to check for LGPLv3+
compatibility.
------------------------
Transition plan:
1. libgnutls-dev in sid and libgnutls28-dev in experimental start
providing libgnutls-openssl-dev. [DONE]
2. The respective version of libgnutls-dev propages to testing. [DONE]
3. The rdeps change their build-dependencies from libgnutls-dev to
the purely virtual package libgnutls-openssl-dev.
4. The updated rdeps enter testing.
5. Start providing libgnutls-openssl-dev from libgnutls28-dev in sid,
stop doing so in libgnutls-dev.
6. BinNMU all rdeps.
------------------------
Step 6 is necessary since the packages usually depend on both
libgnutls-openssl27 and libgnutls26, also we want to verify
buildability.
Does this plan look good? I would start submitting bug-reports against
the rdeps, asking them to change build-deps as a next step.
Ben file:
title = "libgnutls-openssl27";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgnutls-openssl27";
is_good = .build-depends ~ "libgnutls-openssl-dev";
is_bad = .build-depends ~ "libgnutls-dev";
cu Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-06-19 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
[...]
> All built and migrated afaics.
Splendid. Let's close this bug-report.
thanks, cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
--- End Message ---
Reply to: