Bug#746241: marked as done (transition: enet)
Your message dated Sat, 31 May 2014 19:42:08 +0200
with message-id <538A1470.8040803@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#746241: transition: enet
has caused the Debian Bug report #746241,
regarding transition: enet
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
746241: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746241
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: enet
- From: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:46:31 +0200
- Message-id: <20140428124631.3875.58739.reportbug@snout.igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
enet had a soname change (just accepted into experimental) and needs a
transition. The ABI changes should be unproblematic (just new members
in a public struct). There also are only a few rdeps.
Ansgar
Ben file:
title = "enet";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libenet2a" | .depends ~ "libenet7";
is_good = .depends ~ "libenet7";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libenet2a";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 26/05/14 11:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/05/14 09:28, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> writes:
>>> On 28/04/14 14:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>>>> enet had a soname change (just accepted into experimental) and needs a
>>>> transition. The ABI changes should be unproblematic (just new members
>>>> in a public struct). There also are only a few rdeps.
>>>
>>> Please go ahead and upload to unstable. Let me know when enet has been built
>>> everywhere in order to schedule the binnmus.
>>
>> enet is now built everywhere with the exception of sparc (which seems to
>> be lagging quite a bit).
>
> binnmus scheduled.
And enet went in. Closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: