Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html
On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I wish to upload miniupnpc version 1.9.20140401, which bumped the SONAME
> to 10. Affected packages (as per apt-rdepends):
>
> Reverse Depends: 0ad (>= 0.0.16-2+b1)
> Reverse Depends: bitcoin-qt (>= 0.9.1-1)
> Reverse Depends: bitcoind (>= 0.9.1-1)
> Reverse Depends: libeiskaltdcpp2.2 (>= 2.2.9-3)
> Reverse Depends: libminiupnpc-dev (= 1.6-3)
> Reverse Depends: litecoin-qt (>= 0.8.7.1-1)
> Reverse Depends: litecoind (>= 0.8.7.1-1)
> Reverse Depends: maki-plugins (>= 1.4.0+dfsg-1+b1)
> Reverse Depends: megaglest (>= 3.7.1-3)
> Reverse Depends: miniupnpc (>= 1.6-3)
> Reverse Depends: transmission-cli (>= 2.82-1.1)
> Reverse Depends: transmission-daemon (>= 2.82-1.1)
> Reverse Depends: transmission-gtk (>= 2.82-1.1)
> Reverse Depends: transmission-qt (>= 2.82-1.1)
> Reverse Depends: warzone2100 (>= 3.1~beta11-2.1)
>
> Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that migrates.
That would also let libenet and 0ad migrate.
In the meantime, please upload to experimental so that it goes through NEW.
Emilio
> I'm holding the upload until I have your green light. Note that I haven't
> tested to rebuilding all the reverse dependencies, and I'm not sure I'll
> have the time to do so in the forseable future, so help regarding this
> would be really appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
> Ben file:
>
> title = "miniupnpc";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libminiupnpc8" | .depends ~ "libminiupnpc10";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libminiupnpc10";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libminiupnpc8";
>
>
Reply to: