[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#745209: marked as done (transition: gloox)

Your message dated Sun, 25 May 2014 10:02:49 +0200
with message-id <20140525080249.GU15435@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#745209: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #745209,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
745209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
transition (just like #736219 was), with only 4 source packages affected, and
only 2 of them are in testing:

licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)

Assuming the release team has no objections, I'll go ahead and upload this to
unstable directly.

Ben file:

title = "gloox";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgloox11" | .depends ~ "libgloox12";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgloox12";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgloox11";

Regards,
Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-5-vclaptop-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 15:27:45 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:17:34 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> 
> > nmu 0ad_0.0.16-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libgloox12'
> > nmu licq_1.8.1-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libgloox12'
> > 
> Scheduled (excluding 0ad/armhf which built against libgloox12 already).
> 
All transitioned to testing, closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: